Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -LegacyBuild Academy
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-23 05:54:23
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (19)
Related
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Pull Up a Seat for Jennifer Lawrence's Chicken Shop Date With Amelia Dimoldenberg
- Brittany goes to 'Couples Therapy;' Plus, why Hollywood might strike
- SpaceX wants this supersized rocket to fly. But will investors send it to the Moon?
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Break Up After 27 Years of Marriage
- A magazine touted Michael Schumacher's first interview in years. It was actually AI
- Should EPA Back-Off Pollution Controls to Help LNG Exports Replace Russian Gas in Germany?
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Mattel unveils a Barbie with Down syndrome
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Inside Clean Energy: Who’s Ahead in the Race for Offshore Wind Jobs in the US?
- This Next-Generation Nuclear Power Plant Is Pitched for Washington State. Can it ‘Change the World’?
- The U.S. has more banks than anywhere on Earth. That shapes the economy in many ways
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Our final thoughts on the influencer industry
- Homeware giant Bed Bath & Beyond has filed for bankruptcy
- In the US West, Researchers Consider a Four-Legged Tool to Fight Two Foes: Wildfire and Cheatgrass
Recommendation
Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
Hailey Bieber Responds to Criticism She's Not Enough of a Nepo Baby
Dealers still sell Hyundais and Kias vulnerable to theft, but insurance is hard to get
When you realize your favorite new song was written and performed by ... AI
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
First Republic Bank shares plummet, reigniting fears about U.S. banking sector
Bed Bath & the great Beyond: How the home goods giant went bankrupt
Nuclear Energy Industry Angles for Bigger Role in Washington State and US as Climate Change Accelerates